Power vs. Principle: The Ongoing Battle to Influence the International Criminal Court

This study examines the political influence exerted on the ICC by specific states, the UN Security Council, and other political actors. It aims to demonstrate, th- rough concrete examples, how these actors attempt to pressure the Court and its judicial processes in ways that conflict with the principles of international criminal justice. Furthermore, it highlights systemic flaws that render the ICC vulnerable to political inter- ference. By identifying these structural deficiencies, the study proposes measures to strengthen the ICC’s independence and impartiality, thereby enhancing its resilience against undue political influence and ensuring its ability to deliver effective international criminal justice.

Download the Discussion Paper
Ihsan Faruk Kılavuz
Ihsan Faruk Kılavuz
Ihsan Faruk Kılavuz holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from Ankara Haci Bayram Veli (Ankara Gazi) University (2015–19) and a Master of Laws degree from Queen Mary University of London (2022–23). With one year’s experience as a trainee solicitor, he specialises in public international law — including human rights law and the law of armed conflict — alongside expertise in terrorism issues, migration studies, and international treaty law. He is currently undertaking a PhD in public law at Galatasaray University.

MORE FROM AUTHOR

Europe on the Sidelines: The Iran War and the Fracturing of the Western Order

On the morning of 28 February 2026, the United States and Israel launched a large-scale military campaign against Iran, marking one of the most...

Trump’s Board of Peace: Big Promises, Thin Prospects

The international system has entered an age of permanent crisis, where disputes escalate quickly into armed confrontation, and wars are no longer resolved but...

MORE FROM CURRENT CATEGORY