US-China rivalry stirs ghosts from the past

    The Indo-Pacific region presents a rich tapestry of the US administration’s current thinking and manoeuvres within a complex global picture. The longstanding tension between China and Taiwan has been pervasive, as has the United States’ resolute stance in defending Taiwan’s position and countering China’s expansionism. Hence, the US decision-makers embarked on a charm offensive, seeking to forge deeper friendship bonds became apparent.

    In this context, a significant initial step was taken in September 2021 with the signing of the AUKUS agreement among the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. This step aimed to enhance Australia’s security capacity, enabling it to access nuclear-powered submarines. The latter are superior and more capable than conventional ships and will provide a strategic balance against China’s military buildup. Additionally, the agreement led to an increase in rotational military units stationed at strategic American army bases. Unsurprisingly, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Cao Licien criticised the deal, stating it would “seriously undermine regional peace and stability.”

    2023 witnessed heightened military collaboration between the US and Australia. In January, Australia announced the acquisition of 40 Black Hawk helicopters worth 1.96 billion dollars from the US. Last week, Canberra revealed its plan to purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles worth 1.7 billion dollars from the US. Such high-level military procurement shows how Australia is increasingly considered a reliable ally of the US, indicating a significant balancing act against China. This balancing act holds political and economic consequences, especially considering China’s status as Australia’s largest trading partner.

    The AUKUS agreement included Australia cancelling a 66-billion-dollar contract for a French-made conventional submarine fleet. The revocation of this contract resulted in a months-long diplomatic crisis within the Western alliance. Macron’s recent visit to Beijing was also meant to send a strong signal to Washington. During this trip, the French President, who had already angered the US with his ambivalent stance on Taiwan, stated that Europe would not be part of a potential conflict between the US and China.

    Against this backdrop, the joint military exercise involving the US, Australia, Japan, and the Philippines attracted attention, indicating that Southeast Asian geopolitical dynamics could undergo disruptive transformations as Washington reshapes the security equation.

    During the Cold War, the US military doctrine focused on the ability to conduct two major wars simultaneously. Considering the sophisticated nature of today’s Russian and Chinese militaries, managing two wars simultaneously presents various financial and logistical challenges for the US. Therefore, the US strategic thinking has evolved, seeking to strengthen defence alliances and provide more advanced capabilities to allies like Australia, Ukraine, and Taiwan. Relying on partners who have beef in the game, and some are already engaged in conflicts (e.g. Ukraine), is an effective solution for the US in the short and long term.

    Washington’s current approach to China is reminiscent of past policies towards Russia. One of these comes directly to mind: the 2007 crisis concerning the radar and ballistic missile defence facilities to be built in Poland and Czechia. These installations aimed to limit Russia’s influence but were construed as protecting Europe from Iran and North Korea. At that time, Putin warned that if the US were to build a missile defence system, Russia might consider targeting missiles at Poland and the Czech Republic. However, the expansion of US military presence in the region continued during the Obama era. In October 2009, during a visit to Warsaw by then Vice President Joe Biden, a new and smaller defence project with a similar agenda to the one presented in 2007 was introduced, and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk welcomed this project.

    These back-and-forth manoeuvres led Russia to adopt a more hawkish posture, leading to Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. Paradoxically, the Kremlin’s reaction led to more US military presence in the region and made the expansion of NATO a logical outcome. Since then, several former Warsaw Pact countries joined the transatlantic alliance, leading to a slow strategic encirclement of Russia and a quagmire for Russian troops in Ukraine, significantly weakening Russia’s position.

    The current US manoeuvres regarding China evoke a sense of déjà vu. The slow encirclement of China and the increasing US presence in the region remind us of the strategies previously seen against Russia.

    When examining China’s situation, it’s paramount to acknowledge that Washington cannot ignore the rise of Beijing’s global economic and military power. China’s bellicose policies regarding Taiwan, its economic offensive via the Belt and Road Initiative, and its numerous advancements have left no choice for the US but to keep it at bay. 

    From Washington’s perspective, the best-case scenario would be for Beijing to follow a similar trajectory to what happened with Russia. However, any miscalculation could shift these manoeuvres from deterring China to compiling the threat environment, turning the region into a powder keg that may explode across the world.

    This article originally appeared in the opinion section of the website Middle East Monitor.

    Latest Articles

    Related Articles